“Exploring the intersection of technology, strategy, investment and social innovation…”

Digital Policy #1: Why Bill C-61 Is a Bad Idea for Canada’s Digital Economy

by Randall on September 3, 2008 · 2 comments

Posted in: New Media,Public Policy,Society

Source: LondonCommons.net

Source: LondonCommons.net

As we approach a Canadian Federal Election, the long simmering issue of proposed Bill C-61 copyright “reform” (often known as Canada’s even more onerous Digital Millenium Copyright Act, patterned after its US counterpart) has surfaced as a potentially big election issue, at least among those who participate in our digital economy. This is the first in a series of posts around  public policy for the digital age.

A recent blog post by my colleague Alec Saunders, “Why I will be voting against Stephen Harper’s Conservatives when an election is called”, reminded me of some of the key reasons why this represents such bad public policy. In Alec’s words, “Bill C-61 would make most ordinary Canadian families into criminals”, because the law’s focus is so askew that ordinary consumer actions would create infringement. Furthermore, the law as drafted gives too much power to the industry to levy fines in ways that short change our cherished judicial process.

Alec isn’t alone. A good example of the grassroots protest is the Facebook Group, “Fair Copyright for Canada”, created by noted Canadian internet legal authority Michael Geist. Notably, this group has grown quickly to 92 000 members, unprecedneted for a legal topic as arcane as Copyright. Clearly, this legislation has struck a nerve, and it should be noted that many of these group members are quite influential in the digital media and computer industry.

I have an even more fundamental objection.  Bill C-61’s provision which attempts to stop people reverse engineering Digital Rights Management measures, quoting from the Draft legislation, prohibits any “… technological measure to descramble a scrambled work or decrypt an encrypted work or to otherwise avoid, bypass, remove, deactivate or impair the technological measure, unless done with the authority of the copyright owner”. By way of analogy, this is like criminalizing locksmiths.

There is no question that such legislation would put a chill on large segments of the software and digital media industry in Canada, simply because it makes innovation and new business models more difficult to develop. An example is that antivirus/security companies often have to reverse engineer security systems to build their perfectly legal product. Make no mistake, those jobs in digital media will be created. The only question is whether, thanks to a lasting chill from Bill C-61, they will be in Canada or elsewhere in our increasingly globalized world.

My message to legislators is that this bill appears woefully unbalanced. I believe there needs to be Copyright legislation. But, like anything else, a balance needs to be struck between technological and business model innovation and the need to protect the incumbent industry. My concern is that our legislators likely lack the detailed technical and economic knowledge of how the digital and internet economies actually function. My suggestion to those in leadership positions in the new economy is to speak up before it is too late. A big slice of our future prosperity is certainly worth lobbying to address the serious flaws in this draft legislation.

About Randall

Randall Howard is a serial entrepreneur and long term technologist with a passion for social innovation.

View all posts by

  • mobiGeek

    I believe there needs to be Copyright legislation

    Why do we need copyright legislation? What is the purpose in it, and is there any evidence anywhere at all that such legislation would support that purpose?

  • I must admit that I’m writing this blog from a perspective of political reality, while recognizing that there exists a huge spectrum of opinion (from the totally libertarian to the strong command and control) on this issue.

    So, I don’t know about you, but I seriously doubt that Copyright will disappear from Canada or the US. The point of my post was not to explore unlikely outlier positions, but to deal with legislation which doesn’t reflect a good balance between various interest groups.

    That being said, if someone from a group like Electronic Freedom Foundation (Brad Templteton feel free to weigh in on this) wants to run with this dialogue, I’m happy for there to be a guest post.


Previous post:

Next post: